You’ve graduated from high school. You’ve entered the college of your choice. There you are in the large auditorium that services as the classroom, eager and ready to learn. You’re an intelligent student – you know you are. Then why are there sometimes particular instances that seem to put your brain on pause? Have you ever wondered why you can’t seem to make the mental connections click on certain concepts?
Maybe the way you were being taught didn’t necessarily mesh with the way you learn. The way you learn and process information is an individual experience, and understanding how you naturally prefer to mentally process information can help you better approach those sometimes difficult to grasp problems.
A model of learning styles generally referred to as the Felder-Silverman model, by Dr. Richard Felder in collaboration with Dr. Linda K. Silverman, an educational psychologist, was originally formulated for use by college instructors and students in engineering and the sciences, but it has subsequently been applied in a broad range of disciplines. Revised in 2002 by Dr. Felder at N.C. State University, the Index of Learning Styles (ILS), an on-line instrument used to assess learning preferences on four dimensions of learning styles can be taken by students interested in exploring their tendencies within the following dimensions:
1. Sensory and Intuitive
2. Visual and Verbal
3. Active and Reflective
4. Sequential and Global.
In the dimension of Sensory and Intuitive, sensory learners look for the facts and seek concrete, procedural information to aid in the comprehension process. On the other end of the spectrum are the intuitive learners. Instead of looking for facts, intuitive learners are interested in finding meaning and seek conceptual, theoretical explanations.
The next dimension is the Visual and Verbal approach. Visual learners prefer diagrams, graphs and other visual tools that convey the information at hand; however, verbal learners respond more favorably to the same information explained through the written word or heard aloud.
The third dimension explores Active and Reflective learners. Active learners are hands-on learners that problem-solve through actively trying and working in groups, while reflective learners analyze and evaluate the information in detail first, and often prefer to problem solve on their own.
The fourth dimension assesses Sequential and Global learning. Sequential learners process information best when it is presented in a linear, step by step way. As the details are put in place, they are then able to understand the entire picture. Global learners prefer to start from the top – see the whole picture first, and then work in the details.
Once you are aware of which category you lean toward within each dimension, you can move forward in strengthening your learning methods. Perhaps it is a matter of implementing more balance within the various dimensions, or maybe it is posing particular questions to your instructors that may aid you in gaining a clearer perspective. Obtaining knowledge on techniques you can employ to help yourself learn will not only accelerate your comprehension process, but it will make your overall learning experience all the more effective.